The Truth About Charlie Kirk. Who He Was, What He Believed, and The World He Hoped To Create
- Nick Frost
- Sep 26
- 8 min read
September 10th, 2025, the outdoor campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, UT was a sea of mostly young, white college students surrounding a tent with the words, "Prove Me Wrong," in bold, repeated on all four sides and separated by a single lightning bolt. Across the top, the tent read, "The American Comeback."
Many in attendance could be heard chanting, "USA, USA," on repeat. Without knowing, one might think they were at some sporting event. While this was not a sport, in the typical sense, this type of event had become well known across western culture.
This was a performance debate, hosted by Charlie Kirk, the right-wing nationalist, pod cast host, and CEO of Turning Point USA. The college students in attendance had come to listen to, or debate against, the infamous Charlie Kirk. The performance ended abruptly when a single shot rang out, a bullet struck Charlie in the neck and ultimately ended his life.
Shortly after his death America took to the internet to discuss the shooting, wish his family thoughts and prayers, and the occasional troll doing what trolls do. Causing misery for everyday people. Cheering for someones death is a disgusting act. No one in America deserves to be killed in this, or any other way.
Understandably, Kirk's fans were disgusted by heinous messages cheering for his demise. It became a political battle minutes after Kirk was shot, and long before anyone knew anything about the shooter, his motives, and why they would have targeted him at all. The one thing that is for sure, the violent rhetoric coming from the right about the left, would have been applauded by Charlie.
But I don't want to get off topic, if you want to read more about the strange circumstances surrounding the hunt for the shooter, and the fallout from his murder, you can read more here.
Charlie Kirk's Political Views and the Organization He Founded
The man who started Turning Point USA after dropping out of college at just 18 years old, a decision Kirk discussed, on occasion, with mixed emotions, became the fastest growing young adult organization in the country. If you mention his name to any young adult in America, or in many other countries around the world, there's instant recognition.
What is Turning Point USA? What do they do? What were Charlie's goals and aspirations for the organization, and How did he grow the company so quickly?
Answering these questions will shine a light on Charlie's motives, beliefs, and future plans he had for himself, the country, and his company.
Turning Point USA is a non-profit political right-wing organizing and advocacy group. In other words, they push their right-wing political agenda on young adults across the country in order to grow their following and hopefully win elections.
What's wrong with that?
Let's take a look, shall we. According to Influence Watch TPUSA was caught in Fall 2020, of paying teenagers through its marketing firm to use real and fake social media accounts to promote thousands of posts created by TPUSA that appeared to support the re-election of then-President Trump.
In September 2020, Facebook banned 200 Facebook accounts, 55 Facebook pages, and 76 Instagram accounts linked to the campaign. Twitter later banned 262 similar accounts. While this isn't illegal, it's a form of dishonesty, and a way to sway opinion.
Charlie Kirk is a self-proclaimed Christian. I'm not sure how Christian it is to apply the same tactics Russia does to get people to think there are actually more people who have an opinion about something when it's actually just a bot or an account that's pushing lies, propaganda, and misinformation.
How does Turning Point make money?
Largely through donations from right-wing groups, billionaires, and others who have a vested interest in putting Republicans in power. Turning Point's main mission is to turn young white adults into Republicans.
The problem with that, is that Republicans absorbed the racist, white evangelicals, and other hate groups into their fold and have now become the party of Trump. A man who is, right now, actively doing everything he can to overthrow democracy. Ask yourself this, why would Trump pay millions of dollars on a ball room, to not ever be able to use it?
By the time they are finished with it, Trump's second term will be nearly over. Why would he invest all that money into something he can never use? This, plus the fact that Trump has said over and over again, mostly in public in front of cameras that he hopes to be the last President of the United States.
He just said this when he was visiting the UK. He's said it to reporters, and he's even spent money on making merchandise that says, Trump 2028 on it. If you don't think Trump will try EVERYTHING he can to stay in power, you are either a moron or you are not paying attention. He already tried to overthrow the government once before. Why on Earth would he not do it again?
This is who Charlie Kirk, and Turning Point USA have decided to back. This is who they've decided to invest millions of dollars in helping to win elections. All because they want political power! They get people to buy in by hiding behind a bible, as if the Nazi party didn't do the EXACT same thing.
American Christian Hero and Martyr, or Racist, Hateful, White Evangelical Nationalist
Charlie Kirk uses the same tactics that the evangelical nationalists have been using for years. Lie about Christianity's place in the history of the USA, cherry pick verses and scripture that suit his goals, and ignore everything else in the bible.
He's as far from a Christian as anyone. Sure, he knows bible verses, but does that make someone a good Christian? Does being able to quote from a book make someone good?
What does?
What makes someone a good Christian?
I'm going to say, listening to the words and lessons he taught. Be kind to your neighbors, all of them, not just the white ones or the ones that look like you.
Give the least of them, not just to the wealthy donors who support your business aspirations. I'm pretty sure he said something about the meek inheriting the earth. Have you seen Charlie Kirk's massive mansion?
Not the biggest in the world by any measure, but he resembles the faith worshipers who swoop down on a private jet, more than someone who ACTUALLY cares about feeding the homeless, helping the addicts, spending time with the wicked.
Charlie Kirk, used the bible to instill fear, project his insecurities, demean women and their role in society, and he was doing it to children and young adults. He understood that, just like in Nazi Germany, the Republicans needed to build an army of the youth. They are the future after all.
I've heard him tell a girl who was frightened about what her child might learn in the world, and instead of saying, you should expose your child to new people, new experiences, have them listen to new ideas and teach them side by side what are you hearing, how does that make you feel, what are you seeing, and how does that make you feel?
Instead, his message to her was don't go outside, stay in your home and huddle down and read the bible. He said a woman should be proud to be at home.
But what he really meant is, a woman's place is in the home, nowhere else. He cherry picks bible verses to deny gay rights, and during a performance debate gets schooled on the history of gender fluidity and instead of conceding the point, he just falls back on his own biased opinion, "well I still think it's wrong." Admitting, the only reason he disagrees with gay marriage is because he thinks its yucky.
The ultimate goal of the evangelical nationalists is political power. They want the USA to become a theocracy. A government like Isreal. Controlled by the church, as long as it's their church, and they don't mind lying, violence, ignoring the teaching's of Christ to get it done.
How Did Charlie Kirk Treat Others, Who Didn't Share His Views
As I've stated before, Charlie Kirk was no dummy. He built a company and got millions of dollars in donations every year by pitching his idea and view of where the Republican party needed to go. He knew that social media and the internet didn't yet have the oversight that TV has.
Pitching his plan to wealthy Republican donors was a no brainer. Charlie Kirk had skills, and he was passionate about what he felt was the right direction for Americans to be headed. So also did Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini. I am NOT saying Charlie Kirk had anything in connection or was like these guys in any way.
I'm only saying that a nationalist drive and desire are not good things. A nationalist is someone who has an extreme view on their country, it's place in the world, and the direction it should be headed. Nationalism is a curse on the country who bares its frantic, violent worshipers.
Charlie Kirk was one of these nationalists. How did he treat others though?
Charlie had a belief that a woman's job was to stay at home, listen to her husband, have babies, and be happy about it. During several debates he took the position that women are unhappy today because they've been allowed to explore other options.
He's made claims that women were happier in the 50's and before because they were primarily stay at home mothers. Without any evidence to support his claims, he pushes this narrative on young people around the world.
Not even taking into account that before the 60's women didn't have a voice. They couldn't vote, couldn't leave their husbands in many instances, were victims of abuse and often couldn't do anything about it.
When women in the 50's and before became too sexual, not sexual enough, too depressed, too happy, if they had nearly any kind of issues and they sought help, they would either be lobotomized or sent to an institution. Women were marginalized like all others in a white dominated patriarchal society.
Kirk ignores these facts completely and leans on the bible to tell women to hunker down in their homes and read it if they are in fear. Not acknowledging that in biblical days women were treated as property. All throughout the bible it refers to women as property.
What about others who are marginalized?
Charlie's opinion on them is clear as day. He thinks any DEI hire is just someone getting a position they did not deserve, aren't smart enough to earn, and probably stole from a qualified white person. In fact, he's said that when he sees a black piolet, he's frightened and unsure if they have the skills enough to fly the plane.
He said, "Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously." When he was discussing Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative-action picks.
He doesn't respect the people he's debating either. In a number of clips he can be seen looking off into the distance, body slumped like he's bored, like a brat child getting chewed out by a parent when they didn't think the did something wrong.
Just like Ben Shapiro said, the only time you should speak to a liberal is when its in front of a crowd of people and you can embarass them. Charlie Kirk seems to subscribe to this same type of belief.
Charlie is no American hero. He's just another white evangelical nationalist who found a way to get big money donors to give him money to convert America's youth and the youth of other nations to a white's only version of THEIR ideal world.
A world Americans and the world fought and died for to prevent from becoming the new world order. White supremacy, hate, violence, and nationalism is on the rise in US and around the world. A study was just released about the rising trend of right-wing violence in America.
It was up on the govt website for a few days before it was quickly taken down after Trump made the claim that left-wing violence is destroying our country. It turns out it's the other way around. It's not an opinion, it's a fact.
And Charlie used to say, "facts don't care about your feelings."


Comments